The Mudgal committee
investigating spot-fixing allegations in the Indian Premier League cricket
tournament submitted its final report to the Supreme Court on Monday, lawyers
said.
The apex court will
deliberate on the findings on November 10 which could determine if world
cricket chief Narayanaswami Srinivasan can seek re-election as president of the
Indian board.
"We have
submitted the report in a sealed envelope to the court," Raju
Ramachandran, lawyer for the panel, told AFP, without elaborating.
The panel, which is
headed by former judge Mukul Mudgal and includes ex-India captain Sourav
Ganguly, had in February presented a sealed envelope to the court containing
names of 13 individuals who needed to be probed further.
The court revealed
that Srinivasan was one of the names on the list and ordered the panel to
investigate him and the 12 other unidentified persons.
The panel's preliminary
report had concluded that Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan -- who was
the team principal of the Chennai Super Kings franchise -- could be guilty of
illegal betting on IPL games.
The Super Kings are
owned by India Cements, whose managing director is Srinivasan. The team is
captained by India skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni.
The court barred
Srinivasan from carrying out his duties as president of the Board of Control
for Cricket in India (BCCI) until it had delivered its final verdict, but did not
stop him from heading the International Cricket Council.
The sixth IPL season
last year was mired in controversy after police launched legal proceedings
against several IPL officials and cricketers, including former Test fast bowler
Shanthakumaran Sreesanth, for illegal betting and spot-fixing.
The IPL, which began
in 2008, features the world's top players signed up for huge fees by companies
and high-profile individuals in a glitzy mix of sport and entertainment.
International news
organisations including Agence France-Presse (AFP) have suspended their
on-field coverage of matches hosted by the BCCI since 2012 after the board
imposed restrictions on picture agencies.

No comments:
Post a Comment